1. Introduction“de gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum” [1].If everybody might agree—at least inside a tolerant and inclusive human society—that one’s preferences are subjective and thus should not be matter of judgement or discrimination, it appears as more difficult to find consensual definitions about aesthetics in a social context.
Philosophy has questioned the nature and relationships of beauty, aesthetics, and ethics since old times. Human communities have constantly used art modalities everywhere to regulate individual and social emotional life. Even the oldest human artefacts, though created in an utilitarian perspective, show aesthetic preoccupations—but why spend so much time and effort to make a tool beautiful and not just practical?
Recent research in neuroscience and neuroaesthetics describe the universal human thriving for creation and art as a response to the primary need of balance, harmony, and appeasement when facing life difficulties, pain, and distress.
2. The aesthetic brainMany theories have been elaborated on the nature and function of the arts, on human creativity, and skills. Arts have accompanied pragmatic, philosophic, and religious thinking from the very beginnings of the human society, offering individual and community emotions’ regulation. Through current neuroscientific research, we learn more and more about our body and mind needs. A specific aesthetic thriving offers individual/inner and social/environmental regulation, harmony, and balance through the perception and creation of beauty. It appears that the aesthetic needs are as fundamental as the other human needs [
2]. Our condition is not physically based. The aesthetic and cultural needs actually characterise our belonging to the species. The expressive arts’ languages are transversal and universal, as the human body and mind functioning is fundamentally similar all over the Earth. Satisfying the physiological basic needs offers survival—but an authentic belonging to the human condition implies an active participation in a social and cultural activity [
3]. The concept of inclusivity means that every human, independent of age, race, gender, culture, in any physical and mental health conditions, is an actor in the World, together with all the other elements of the living and the non-living environment.
3. Art and ethicsIf we can assume that art is acting through aesthetic elements—such as emotional impact and effectiveness created by art media, narratives, metaphores and symbols—what about the relationships between art and ethics? Does art imply moral and ethical aspects which would be a condition for artistic value? A thorough survey of contemporary philosophical reflection is presented in the article “Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value” [
4]. Several philosophical visions have been historically elaborated on the value of an art work considered under its moral relevance [
5,
6,
7]. In the contemporary society, the complexity of opposite concepts such as aestheticism, ethicism, anti-theoretical point of view, or moderate moralism/immoralism, does not allow binary radical conclusions. The article defines a “cognitive immoralism” which opens the way to subtle evaluation of the intricate artistic and moral values of a given art work. This is important as it helps reconsidering ethical and moral aspects of an artwork inside its specific social and historical context. It also introduces an aesthetic distance offering the possibility to appreciate artistic value independently from moral aspects, thus avoiding sometime very conservative or on the contrary radical transformative opinions. The aesthetic distance offers cathartic and sublimatory effects to any art experience, and its effectiveness is related to its artistic value. The moral value of an artwork has to be examined in its historical context—which is not the same as the contemporary one. Moral theories and systems are evaluative and specific to each culture. The artist is free to express his own subjective vision and philosophy.
This is precisely why experiencing art therapy is so powerful. As in art, all the human emotions—the most positive as well as the most negative—are welcome in the therapeutic process and contribute to deeper insight, better understanding, and cognitive gain.
4. Healing through arts and arts therapiesFor a long time in the past centuries, a distinction has been established between the natural sciences based on
explanation and the human sciences based on
understanding. The scientific approach is evidence-based, requires experimentally validated proof, and focuses on objectivity. The creative thinking is metaphoric, rooted in our sensibility, and it is phenomenological, comprehensive, dynamic, and subjective. These two forms of our intelligence are complementary and need each other. Both are confronted with ethical questions. We need both scientific skills, inclusive philosophy of life and deep ethical reflexion.
Also, we know that even if we constantly extend our knowledge, we will always have to face the “next” mysterious phenomena. In this respect, art making and art therapy practice bring us closer to the unknown in a physically and emotionally safe way by preserving a part of the mystery which is the nuclear centre of ourselves. Many examples from practice with clients show arts therapies’ effectiveness—beyond any aesthetical criteria. Sometimes failure and error are starting points for a transformative pathway from art work to life philosophy. One day a client in art therapy initiated an art work using an “error”—the “bad end” of a photographic film. The theme of the workshop was to choose one photo from several shots taken by each participant and create an artwork starting from this point. This client choose a “bad” photo, pasted it on a big sheet of paper, and painted around it a colourful abstract painting inspired by the photo. The client told that this image was the most beautiful of all and mostly corresponding to his efforts to change and improve life. The given title was “The Beauty of the Error.” Due to copyright limitations, the client’s original art therapy work cannot be reproduced. An alternative image is presented in
Figure 1 to demonstrate therapeutic steps during the art session. It shows a similar creative and transformative process starting from a failed photo, in search for meaning and finding a kind of beauty specifically in its ambiguity and imprecision.